In this podcast, Mike discusses the factors to consider when you receive an invitation to interview for a law school you've applied to.
You can listen and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, SoundCloud, and Google Podcasts.
This is Mike Spivey, and this is Status Check with Spivey, where we talk about life, law school, law school admissions — which we’re going to focus on today. Because I saw a question posed online, “Should I do X school’s” — I actually don’t even remember what school it was — “X school’s optional interview.” And it kind of fascinated me, because the answer is both straightforward but also incredibly nuanced and introspective, and humans are really bad at introspection. So we’ll sort of dive in first with the straightforward part of it.
Ideally, the answer is, yes always. It’s a datapoint for that school that you’re interested in the school, and it’s a chance for you to humanize yourself, to differentiate yourself, to speak about more and provide more information about yourself in the process. So the most straightforward in a simple level, yeah, do the interview. Here’s where the nuance comes in, not everyone should do interviews.
There’s two reasons why schools interview but it’s really heavily weighted towards the second reason. The first reason is, they want to see if you do it, right, if you show up for the interview and like the Georgetown group interview example. Or if you do a Kira interview, which I know are just awful. But that’s a datapoint that you’re interested in the school. And maybe that’s like 10% of the reason why schools interview.
Let me backtrack. Before the great recession, admissions offices and career services offices did not work very well hand in hand; they sort of operated in silos as their little fiefdoms. The great recession hit; I was actually a dean of career services during the great recession. This is sort of like after my admissions career and before my Spivey Consulting career.
The great recession was a game changer because so many students weren’t getting employed, and if students had even like remotely poor interviews, since law firms went from hiring 55 entering summer class students to 5, even like the tiniest blemishes on your interviews would get you dinged from the OCI process or the summer internship process, the hiring process. It was just a very, very tough time. Like incidentally, two to three years from now we might have another – I don’t think it’s going to be nearly as drastic, but I think we may have another downturn in employment opportunities because of the 9% over-enrollment from this past cycle, two-year term, and I wouldn’t worry about that. Let’s worry about your admissions cycle, get you into schools.
So schools interview so that they can detect people who are bad at interviewing and then they’re probably not going to – particularly the more selective the school can be — the more able they are to say no to someone who is not very strong at interviewing. This data is dated. But I think Harvard tended to admit about 75% of the people they interviewed. Now during competitive cycles, I bet you that number goes down, 70, 65%, I don’t know. They certainly haven’t shared that data with me. So it’s really difficult, but I’m going to try to help if I can.
You have to have a frank conversation with yourself, “Am I good at interviewing?” And it’s interesting because I have a lot of experience helping people answer that question. Shy, introverted people tend to think that they’re not as good at interviewing as they really are, right? So that’s imposter syndrome. In other words, they are better at interviewing than they realize. but because they are shy and introverted and they don’t like to be interviewed, they tend to be overly critical of themselves.
If you are shy and introverted, I’ve mock interviewed — and I’ve interviewed hundreds, if not thousands honestly of people — and there’s nothing wrong with being shy and introverted in an interview. You don’t have to hopping off the screen; you have to be able to talk about yourself in a mindful, thoughtful, somewhat confident — the Journal of Human Resources does tell us that being confident is important in an interview. Being relatable, having an high EQ in a live interview is the most important thing.
So there’s a lot of shy, introverted people out there that are have very high EQs. In fact, they probably correlate, they are more sensitive to the other people so they are better at picking up cues from the other person. I wouldn’t overthink it if you are shy and introverted, that’s not a reason to disqualify yourself.
Here’s the bigger thing I see, and I see this every cycle. Please listen to our podcast that we just did with Terry Real, people who are grandiose, so they mask their insecurities with grandiose statements. And I can think of some examples from my past 23 years. “I’m used to talking to billionaires on jets” — right, someone told me that. Or another person in the same space as I did said, “I only talk to dean level employees.” These people are in the Dunning Kruger side of the equation of sort of interviewing where they would think that they are great at interviews and they are not.
And sadly, we see this every cycle, we see people telling us, “I’m great at interviewing, I don’t understand why I didn’t get into these three schools at the interview because here are my numbers, they are above the medians and I’m great at interviewing,” and within 10 minutes on the phone with them, you could tell that actually probably the interview killed them because they were just like slamming down too much grandiose statements about themselves left and right, trying to overly impress. I mean you have to show people, don’t tell them. Tell them an experience about your life, don’t tell them how great you are.
The best way to impress people is Dale Carnegie, How to Make Friends and Influence People, written in the 1940s — always shows up on this list of like the top five books people should read for self-help. Because it’s really just about being curious, being actively engaged in the other person. So if you are being interviewed, and they ask you what question do you have for them, asking them how they got involved in admissions, asking them about their school, asking them about their law school experience if you know that they went to law school, they’re going to love you. Because people love talking about themselves. Heck, I’m sitting here, voice recording and I like it, right. And no one’s asking me questions.
The more conversational you can do, and here, this is transitions to my last piece of advice, record yourself, practice with others and record it. Is it conversational, are you confident but not grandiose? Are you able to answer questions that are a little bit outside the box?
I think I heard a school once ask, “You find yourself alone on an island with your favorite book, how did you get on that island?” Right, so they are misdirecting you with that favorite book and your mind’s thinking, “What’s my favorite book, what’s my favorite book?” And all of a sudden you have to like completely go 180, how did I get on this island. So that’s a little bit – I mean like business school interviews, I went to business school and the interviews with consulting companies at business school were infinitely harder, “How would you create an algorithm in your mind to determine how many gum balls are in this gum ball machine?” Stuff like that. You’ll never have to ask that.
Law school interviews tend to be easy; they just want to see if you can hold up your end of the conversation in a pleasant, professional, confident way. I know I just gave you a tricky question. But generally, they are a lot easier than people realize, they are not trying to trick you. If you are a jerk, if you’re impolite, if you’re impolite in the process, if you’re haphazard and unprofessional, if you don’t dress professionally, if you look all over the place. If you had five 5-Hour Energies right before the interview, if your sympathetic nervous system is just out of control, then yeah, those are the things they are looking for. But 75-90% of the time, you’re probably okay, just really do a deep-dive inward, ask your friends, ask your friends what are the five words that describe you. Ask them to be completely honest. The saddest thing about this is the people who are the most grandiose, the most overwrought, are the people that are the least likely to recognize it.
So I hope this is helpful. I hope I gave some strategies versus tactics, I can’t give tactics because there’s an almost infinite number of questions schools can ask you at interviews. But generally, they’re going to be about, “Tell us about you,” “Tell us about your future plans,” or “Tell us about us.” Only you know about you, only you know about your future plans, so since there’s no wrong answer, there’s just a wrong way of delivering it. And you should have faith in yourself. You can be calm, collected, shy, it doesn’t matter. You know a ton about yourself, have faith, but please be introspective before you sign off. This is Mike Spivey.


In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Anna Hicks-Jaco is joined by Spivey consultant Meg Krishnan, former Director of Admissions and Programs at UChicago Law, for a conversation about preparing for law school admissions interviews. Meg spent nine admissions cycles at UChicago Law, ultimately running the school’s interview program and personally conducting thousands of admissions interviews. She shares what admissions offices are looking for in interviews and how applicants can prepare in a way that feels confident, natural, and intentional.
They discuss the different roles interviews can play in the admissions process and the different formats applicants may encounter (3:51); what an interviewer may review from your application before speaking with you (6:55); how to prepare your “why law” answer using Meg’s “ghosts of Christmas” framework of past, present, and future (9:08); and how to start researching and preparing for “why this law school?” questions well before receiving an interview invitation (12:18). Meg also shares a simple method for keeping track of school-specific research over time (15:52); what to prioritize once you actually receive an interview invitation, from logistics to reviewing your own application materials (19:35); and why applicants should practice from bullet points rather than scripting and memorizing their answers (24:28).
Anna and Meg also dive deeper into what makes a strong “why X” answer and the importance of connecting what a law school offers back to your own experiences and strengths (28:54); common interview mistakes and how to recover when something goes wrong (31:55); strategies for building confidence before an interview, including an exercise from psychologist Dr. Guy Winch (41:09); and practical ways to reduce distracting filler words and become more comfortable with pauses (43:36). They close with advice on taking care of yourself throughout the process, learning how to reset after a difficult moment, and remembering that receiving an interview invitation itself means the law school is interested in you (51:43).
A note on interview formats: Much of the advice in this episode is most directly applicable to invited interviews and one-on-one interviews with a human interviewer. However, many of the preparation strategies discussed also apply to other formats, including Kira and other prerecorded interviews.
Related resources: For a broader overview of law school interviews, including different interview formats and additional preparation advice, see our Interview Strategy Deep Dive with Former Law School Admissions Officers podcast. For more on the types of questions applicants may encounter, listen to Five Categories of Law School Admissions Interview Questions & How to Answer Them, with former Harvard Law Director of Admissions Karen Buttenbaum—including a bonus sixth category of curveball questions.
For more advice and resources on researching individual law schools and developing a strong, differentiated “why X,” see our Why X Essay Deep Dive: Advice from Former Law School Admissions Officers podcast episode. Anna also references our earlier conversation with psychologist Dr. Guy Winch, Dr. Guy Winch on Handling Rejection (& Waiting), which includes the confidence exercise discussed in this episode.
You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. You can read a full transcript of this episode with timestamps below.


Originally published in 2021, this conversation with Dr. Gabor Maté explores self-doubt, stress, anxiety, addiction, and the pressures that can come with pursuing ambitious academic and professional goals.
Mike Spivey speaks with Dr. Maté, world-renowned physician and author of In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts, When the Body Says No, and The Myth of Normal, about how these challenges can affect prospective law students and others navigating high-pressure environments.
One of Dr. Maté’s insights for prospective and incoming law students:
“You're going to look at all your confident classmates, and you're going to go in there with all manner of self-doubt. You're making the big mistake of comparing their outside with your inside. You have no idea what their inside is like. And believe me, you're not the only one.”
This episode is a re-release of our 2021 conversation with Dr. Gabor Maté.


In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Mike is joined by Dr. Milana Hogan, Chief Talent Officer at Sullivan & Cromwell, and Rob Baker, a former law firm hiring committee member and BigLaw attorney, for a conversation about the increasingly front-loaded BigLaw recruiting process and what prospective and current law students should know about navigating it. Rob has held recruiting roles at large, medium, and boutique-sized law firms, while Dr. Hogan has spent nearly two decades at Sullivan & Cromwell working in talent, associate development, and recruiting.
The group discusses how law firm recruiting has shifted earlier over time and the market pressures driving that change (7:41); whether hiring could move even earlier and why first-semester law school grades may serve as a practical stopping point (13:48); whether 0Ls should already be reaching out to firms and how to approach those conversations from a learning rather than a “will you hire me?” posture (17:13); the value of LinkedIn, low-pressure outreach, and building relationships before recruiting formally begins (20:53); and why the current system may create new opportunities for 2Ls and 3Ls who missed out earlier in the process (24:39).
They also discuss how AI is affecting BigLaw work and hiring, including Sullivan & Cromwell’s use of AI as one part of its holistic hiring process (28:34); what can turn hiring partners off in an interview and why trying too hard to demonstrate how smart you are can backfire (31:47); the importance of curiosity, humility, and a willingness to learn from more experienced lawyers (34:45); and why students should take ownership of their careers, seek out opportunities, and practice interviewing before the real thing (37:52).
Related resources: Mike references NALP Executive Director Nikia Gray’s article, The “Cruel” Recruiting Timeline, which examines the history of OCI and the market forces behind the increasingly accelerated law firm recruiting process. He also references a South Park episode parodying Black Friday’s increasingly early start as an analogy for how BigLaw recruiting has continued moving earlier.
You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. You can read a full transcript of this episode with timestamps below.