In this podcast, Mike discusses the factors to consider when you receive an invitation to interview for a law school you've applied to.
You can listen and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, SoundCloud, and Google Podcasts.
This is Mike Spivey, and this is Status Check with Spivey, where we talk about life, law school, law school admissions — which we’re going to focus on today. Because I saw a question posed online, “Should I do X school’s” — I actually don’t even remember what school it was — “X school’s optional interview.” And it kind of fascinated me, because the answer is both straightforward but also incredibly nuanced and introspective, and humans are really bad at introspection. So we’ll sort of dive in first with the straightforward part of it.
Ideally, the answer is, yes always. It’s a datapoint for that school that you’re interested in the school, and it’s a chance for you to humanize yourself, to differentiate yourself, to speak about more and provide more information about yourself in the process. So the most straightforward in a simple level, yeah, do the interview. Here’s where the nuance comes in, not everyone should do interviews.
There’s two reasons why schools interview but it’s really heavily weighted towards the second reason. The first reason is, they want to see if you do it, right, if you show up for the interview and like the Georgetown group interview example. Or if you do a Kira interview, which I know are just awful. But that’s a datapoint that you’re interested in the school. And maybe that’s like 10% of the reason why schools interview.
Let me backtrack. Before the great recession, admissions offices and career services offices did not work very well hand in hand; they sort of operated in silos as their little fiefdoms. The great recession hit; I was actually a dean of career services during the great recession. This is sort of like after my admissions career and before my Spivey Consulting career.
The great recession was a game changer because so many students weren’t getting employed, and if students had even like remotely poor interviews, since law firms went from hiring 55 entering summer class students to 5, even like the tiniest blemishes on your interviews would get you dinged from the OCI process or the summer internship process, the hiring process. It was just a very, very tough time. Like incidentally, two to three years from now we might have another – I don’t think it’s going to be nearly as drastic, but I think we may have another downturn in employment opportunities because of the 9% over-enrollment from this past cycle, two-year term, and I wouldn’t worry about that. Let’s worry about your admissions cycle, get you into schools.
So schools interview so that they can detect people who are bad at interviewing and then they’re probably not going to – particularly the more selective the school can be — the more able they are to say no to someone who is not very strong at interviewing. This data is dated. But I think Harvard tended to admit about 75% of the people they interviewed. Now during competitive cycles, I bet you that number goes down, 70, 65%, I don’t know. They certainly haven’t shared that data with me. So it’s really difficult, but I’m going to try to help if I can.
You have to have a frank conversation with yourself, “Am I good at interviewing?” And it’s interesting because I have a lot of experience helping people answer that question. Shy, introverted people tend to think that they’re not as good at interviewing as they really are, right? So that’s imposter syndrome. In other words, they are better at interviewing than they realize. but because they are shy and introverted and they don’t like to be interviewed, they tend to be overly critical of themselves.
If you are shy and introverted, I’ve mock interviewed — and I’ve interviewed hundreds, if not thousands honestly of people — and there’s nothing wrong with being shy and introverted in an interview. You don’t have to hopping off the screen; you have to be able to talk about yourself in a mindful, thoughtful, somewhat confident — the Journal of Human Resources does tell us that being confident is important in an interview. Being relatable, having an high EQ in a live interview is the most important thing.
So there’s a lot of shy, introverted people out there that are have very high EQs. In fact, they probably correlate, they are more sensitive to the other people so they are better at picking up cues from the other person. I wouldn’t overthink it if you are shy and introverted, that’s not a reason to disqualify yourself.
Here’s the bigger thing I see, and I see this every cycle. Please listen to our podcast that we just did with Terry Real, people who are grandiose, so they mask their insecurities with grandiose statements. And I can think of some examples from my past 23 years. “I’m used to talking to billionaires on jets” — right, someone told me that. Or another person in the same space as I did said, “I only talk to dean level employees.” These people are in the Dunning Kruger side of the equation of sort of interviewing where they would think that they are great at interviews and they are not.
And sadly, we see this every cycle, we see people telling us, “I’m great at interviewing, I don’t understand why I didn’t get into these three schools at the interview because here are my numbers, they are above the medians and I’m great at interviewing,” and within 10 minutes on the phone with them, you could tell that actually probably the interview killed them because they were just like slamming down too much grandiose statements about themselves left and right, trying to overly impress. I mean you have to show people, don’t tell them. Tell them an experience about your life, don’t tell them how great you are.
The best way to impress people is Dale Carnegie, How to Make Friends and Influence People, written in the 1940s — always shows up on this list of like the top five books people should read for self-help. Because it’s really just about being curious, being actively engaged in the other person. So if you are being interviewed, and they ask you what question do you have for them, asking them how they got involved in admissions, asking them about their school, asking them about their law school experience if you know that they went to law school, they’re going to love you. Because people love talking about themselves. Heck, I’m sitting here, voice recording and I like it, right. And no one’s asking me questions.
The more conversational you can do, and here, this is transitions to my last piece of advice, record yourself, practice with others and record it. Is it conversational, are you confident but not grandiose? Are you able to answer questions that are a little bit outside the box?
I think I heard a school once ask, “You find yourself alone on an island with your favorite book, how did you get on that island?” Right, so they are misdirecting you with that favorite book and your mind’s thinking, “What’s my favorite book, what’s my favorite book?” And all of a sudden you have to like completely go 180, how did I get on this island. So that’s a little bit – I mean like business school interviews, I went to business school and the interviews with consulting companies at business school were infinitely harder, “How would you create an algorithm in your mind to determine how many gum balls are in this gum ball machine?” Stuff like that. You’ll never have to ask that.
Law school interviews tend to be easy; they just want to see if you can hold up your end of the conversation in a pleasant, professional, confident way. I know I just gave you a tricky question. But generally, they are a lot easier than people realize, they are not trying to trick you. If you are a jerk, if you’re impolite, if you’re impolite in the process, if you’re haphazard and unprofessional, if you don’t dress professionally, if you look all over the place. If you had five 5-Hour Energies right before the interview, if your sympathetic nervous system is just out of control, then yeah, those are the things they are looking for. But 75-90% of the time, you’re probably okay, just really do a deep-dive inward, ask your friends, ask your friends what are the five words that describe you. Ask them to be completely honest. The saddest thing about this is the people who are the most grandiose, the most overwrought, are the people that are the least likely to recognize it.
So I hope this is helpful. I hope I gave some strategies versus tactics, I can’t give tactics because there’s an almost infinite number of questions schools can ask you at interviews. But generally, they’re going to be about, “Tell us about you,” “Tell us about your future plans,” or “Tell us about us.” Only you know about you, only you know about your future plans, so since there’s no wrong answer, there’s just a wrong way of delivering it. And you should have faith in yourself. You can be calm, collected, shy, it doesn’t matter. You know a ton about yourself, have faith, but please be introspective before you sign off. This is Mike Spivey.


In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Mike has a conversation with Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, where she has led the law school since 2020. Prior to her time at GW, she was a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, the University of Colorado Law School, and the University of Kentucky College of Law, and she has served as a Senior Advisor to the Office of Civil Rights of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). She is a graduate of Harvard University (AB), the University of Virginia School of Law (JD), and the University of Colorado (PhD).
Mike and Dean Matthew discuss the increase in law school applicants this cycle (7:42 and 18:11), advice for applying during a competitive cycle (12:16), how the large firm hiring process in law school has changed into something that "bears no resemblance" to how it worked for decades (5:11), how the public interest and government hiring process has changed as well (6:27), how AI could impact legal employment in the future (24:10), why she chose the law school where she attended (2:33), what she would do differently if she were applying today (3:36), how to assess law schools' varying "personalities" (13:22), the fungibility of a JD (16:45), advice for law students (18:53), and what it's like being a law school dean in 2025 (28:53).
You can read more about Dean Matthew here.
We discussed two additional podcast interviews in this episode:
Note: Due to an unexpected technical issue during recording, Mike's audio quality decreases from 7:35 onward. Apologies for any difficulties this may cause, and please note that we have a full transcript of the episode below.
You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. You can read a full transcript with timestamps below.
Correction: Dean Matthew's family reminded her that she actually applied to three law schools rather than two, including Harvard Law, where she received a denial.
As Emmy-winning news anchor Elizabeth Vargas stated in one of our recent episodes, "There is nobody out there who is at the top of their field, in any field, who has not been told 'no.'"


In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Spivey consultant and former admissions dean Nikki Laubenstein discusses the financial aid and student loan considerations that prospective law students should be thinking about post-“Big Beautiful Bill,” joined by Sydney Montgomery, who is the Executive Director & Founder of Barrier Breakers, and Kristin Shea, who has led the law school financial aid office at Syracuse University for almost a decade as a part of a 20-year career in legal education.
Nikki, Sydney, and Kristen talk about the changes to student loans and student loan caps resulting from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (9:53), the changes to repayment plans (36:08), who those changes apply to (5:31), the differences between undergraduate financial aid/scholarships and law school financial aid/scholarships (21:02), understanding tuition vs. total cost of attendance and how that relates to scholarship reconsideration and student loan caps (24:27), possible ways schools could help fill the gap especially for students targeting public interest jobs (38:31), advice for those planning to work while in law school (41:10), why prospective law students should start thinking about financial aid earlier on in the admissions process than most do (30:57), and more.
Barrier Breakers is a nonprofit that has worked with 7,000+ first-generation and other marginalized students on the college and law school application process. Sydney Montgomery, the daughter of a Jamaican immigrant mother and military parents, was the first person from her high school to go to Princeton University and then later Harvard Law School. She has dedicated her life and career to supporting first-generation students and has a particular passion for financial aid. She is a member of the Forbes Nonprofit Council and has been featured in Inc., Forbes, FastCompany, Medium, CNBC, and others.
Kristin Shea is a higher education professional with twenty years of experience, including law school enrollment management, recruitment, and financial aid; alumni, donor, and employer relations; and marketing and communications. The last decade of her career has been dedicated to financial aid, and she is passionate about helping law students make smart, thoughtful financial plans for their education. She holds a bachelor's degree in biology and psychology and an MBA from Le Moyne College.
We hope to do a follow-up episode in the spring with more information on how law schools are addressing these changes. We also encourage you to reach out to the financial aid offices of schools you're considering once admitted to learn about any programs they may offer and any assistance they can provide. As Kristin says in this episode, "The map may have some alternative directions, but you can still reach your destination, and there are many people who want to help." We have also linked a number of financial aid resources below.
Federal Student Aid:
AccessLex Institute Resources:
Free Credit Report:
Annual Credit Report.com - Home Page
Equal Justice Works – LRAP FAQ
Important Questions to Ask About Any LRAP - Equal Justice Works
You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. You can read a full transcript with timestamps below.


In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Mike interviews Elizabeth Vargas, journalist and television news anchor, on her journey to learning how to cope healthily with lifelong anxiety and panic attacks, on overcoming professional setbacks, and on advice for young people facing the stresses of the LSAT, law school admissions, law school, and finding legal employment.
Elizabeth Vargas anchors “Elizabeth Vargas Reports” (weeknights, 7 p.m. ET), an hour-long weekday news program that debuted April 3, 2023 on NewsNation. Vargas has traveled the world covering breaking news stories, reporting in-depth investigations, and conducting newsmaker interviews. She previously hosted the hit newsmagazine show “20/20” on ABC for 15 years, served as Co-Anchor of ABC’s World News Tonight, and was a news anchor and frequent host of “Good Morning America.” She also hosted A&E Investigates, a series of documentaries that still air on Hulu.
In 2016, Vargas released her memoir, Between Breaths: A Memoir of Panic and Addiction, which spent several weeks on the New York Times bestseller list and won numerous awards. Vargas is a member of the board of directors for the non-profit Partnership to End Addiction and hosts “Heart of the Matter,” a podcast focused on addiction, recovery, and the stigma so many face in their effort to heal.
Vargas mentions and recommends writer Mary Karr's books, The Liars' Club and Lit, in this episode.
Mike also discusses our interview with Justin Ishbia, who was the last person admitted to Vanderbilt Law from the waitlist when he applied and now owns the Phoenix Suns.
You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube. You can read a full transcript with timestamps below.